| |
 |
ALRB rules UFW made initial case, sets Jan. 10 hearing
on election objections |
| |
|
|
Deciding the United Farm Workers established a prima facia case
that misconduct by Giumarra Vineyards Corp. tainted the Sept. 1,
2005 election among its table grape workers in Kern and Tulare counties,
the state Agricultural Labor Relations Board on Thursday ordered
a Jan. 10, 2006 hearing to investigate eight objections to the election
filed by the union.
The ALRB's ruling is based on evidence submitted in September
by the UFW with its formal objections, which included 40 declarations
sworn under penalty of perjury. The multi-day session beginning
on Jan. 10 before a state hearing examiner will be an investigative
hearing where evidence will be presented and testimony heard. The
hearing examiner will then issue a recommendation to the members
of the farm labor board who sit in Sacramento.
"If blatant bullying and terrorism from the Giumarras had not tainted
the election, the union would have won a lopsided victory," UFW
President Arturo Rodriguez says. "After the evidence and testimony
is considered, we expect the ALRB will invalidate the election."
The ALRB's Notice of Order Setting Election Objections for a Hearing
seeks to investigate whether company conduct cited in eight union-filed
objections affected the voting:
- Giumarra instituting the payment of waiting or standby time
for packing shed workers in August when it had not previously
been offered.
- Sal Giumarra and company superintendents and foremen telling
workers the grower would face financial ruin or major job cuts
if employees voted for the UFW.
- Foremen threatening workers that Giumarra would no longer provide
housing to employees and workers would be denied unemployment
benefits if the union prevailed.
- Sal Giumarra and other employer agents telling workers the
company would shift from table grape to juice and wine production?producing
widespread job losses?if the UFW won.
- Foremen threatening undocumented workers with being fired if
they voted for the union.
- A foreman interrogating workers about their support for the
UFW.
- A foreman forcing workers to remove and stop wearing union
buttons.
- Assistant foremen remaining in the polling areas while workers
cast ballots.
- end -
|
| |
| |